Develop ideas of where you could incorporate the use of scenario planning in your organization.
First please look at the video about the different between strategic and scenario planning
First please look at the video about the different between strategic and scenario planning
Alexander Singer says “Scenarios are stories about how the future might unfold for our organizations, our communities and our world. Scenarios are not predictions. Rather, they are provocative and plausible accounts of how relevant external forces”. The purpose of scenario thinking is not to identify the most likely future, but to create a map of uncertainty — to acknowledge and examine the visible and hidden forces that are driving us toward the unknown future.
Before I talk about the scenario planning in my organization, I want to raise 2 questions: 1. How will the life be 20 even 30 years later? 2. How to make the people discuss about the future uncertainly things?
After seeing some literatures I find an easy process to make a scenario planning thought TAIDA model. The model is developed by a Chinese consultant. There are 5 stages to make a scenario planning. Tracking, Analyzing, Imaging, Decision, Action.
Tracking
Now in my organization the problem is that low ICT implement, but the school cannot realize the problem, the school leader put more money on academic competition and school environment construction in order to enhance the popularity in the whole mainland China. Because in China if the university has high popularity, more and more students want to entry in, so the university can make more money. In school level, it actually strengthen, while in class level or (students level), the increasing is little even none. Students want high quality teaching rather than good virtual increasing. If the ICT highly integrate into my university, what benefit can students get or what will be bring in the future?
Analyzing
Helpful to achieving the objective | Harmful to achieving the objective | |
Internal attributes of the organization | Strengths | Weakness |
Government support Rich resource of society Hard work students | Low ICT implement Academic corruption Distance teaching Crisis response ability Lock of resource | |
External attributes of the environment | Opportunities | Threats |
Developing Information technology Internationalization | Foreign university |
l There are four questions should be answered in these stage.
l How can we use each Strength?
l How can we stop each Weakness?
l How can we exploit each Opportunity?
l How can we defend against each Threat?
Imagining
Decision
According to the first three stages, my organization should be focus on the e-campus construction, it is not just introduce the ICT devices or ICT idea into university. The process of achieve e-campus is that to make all the teaching resource digitization, including hypostatic objective and virtual objective. Changing university concept to society-university, make the university not just like a closed organization, and fading the concept of school gradually.
Action
It is hard to achieve the scenario planning, it not a 1,2 years plan, it will cost a lot of time to do these, maybe 5 years, maybe 10 years, even more years. So the organization should follow the plan.


Hi Andy:
ReplyDeleteInteresting how you applied the TAIDA model to your university. Just wanted to provide a little bit of background to the methodology.
The TAIDA method is an interpretation of sceanrio planning put forward by Lindgren and Bandhold (2003). It's essentially a simplified version of the model pioneered by Royal Dutch / Shell. Chermack (2011) has called it a practitioner's shorthand manual for exploring the basic concepts of scenario planning.
If anyone is interested in a more fulsome exploration of TAIDA, a second edition (2009) of Lindgren and Bandhold's book is available from the Library as an e-book:
http://library.hku.hk/record=b4353259
Cheers,
Chris
Hi Chris,
DeleteThank you for you sharing about TAIDA model resource. Maybe something wrong with my resource, I will correct it.