Develop and articulate ideas for describing leading change in an organisation of your choice
The framework for leadership which is raised by Fullan (2001) that consists of five core components of leadership: moral purpose, understanding change, relationship building, knowledge creation and sharing and coherence making. Each of these components is critical to the leading change of organization. Now I will apply the framework to my organization.
Moral purpose
A moral purpose contributes to staffs morale, fosters innovation, counters risk-aversion and it provides a unifying strategic theme. School leaders must manage and align the moral purpose with the school development strategy. In my organization (my university), the school has several teams which designs the courses and teaching programme. In sometimes they decide how to make the courses useful to students and how to use the ICT into daily teaching. It can be inferred that this 'moral purpose' passes from the team into their separate teaching environments. However these other ideas do not in themselves inspire staffs in ways that would make these concepts useful as moral purposes for most organization if the school leaders have incomplete understand the idea of moral purpose.
Understanding change
The school leaders know that if the school want to have a further develop, they should clearly understand of why they need change, what change they want, and how to adapt the change. The first important thing is that how to introduce ICT into my organization, because of the in most mainland school, traditional pedagogy take the main role of daily teaching, if the change happen, the leader will worry about the adaption of the teachers, while some of the teacher may confuse about the change, as the “Diffusion of innovation” module shows about 16% people are laggard. Most of such people are not old teachers, to the contrary main of such people are young who has less confidence in accept change.
Relationship building
Relationships are built where there is mutual understanding between or among individuals. However, this is not built overnight. Establishing a relationship has certain requirements for it to develop. This concept is especially true if the individuals have just initiated a mutual connection. The relationship in my organization is quite well. The leader knows that a good relationship between staffs can not only foster the change, but also make the organization stronger. So the school leaders will hold some party or activities to promote the relationship.
The knowledge that is created in such environment is specific to the problem and has just been developed for that particular situation. We need to develop an understanding of these complex processes of sensemaking by different participants in the process and also identify and articulate the knowledge creation process and knowledge sharing and use process. Knowledge is the power of everything, new knowledge come out to adapt the new environment, or we can call it change. In my organization, the department of each faculty will hold a symposium in where teachers can put forward their new find or new theory about pedagogy, sharing with their colleague. If the idea is good for boost the ICT, the innovation will be popularize.
What Fullan calls “coherence making” involves seeking a balance between letting go and even encouraging “disturbance” on the one hand and building coherence, sense and direction on the other. This is the main challenge, as Fullan puts it quoting Pascale, Millemann and Gioja: disturbing the system in such a way "that approximates to the desired outcome". [pg. 108] Organisations, as we are used to them, are designed to foster stability and coherence with specific goals in mind. As such, change is always a threat.
References:
5 Models for Leading Change | Leading Project Teams
http://martinwebster.eu/2011/10/03/5-models-for-leading-change-leading-project-teams/
References:
5 Models for Leading Change | Leading Project Teams
http://martinwebster.eu/2011/10/03/5-models-for-leading-change-leading-project-teams/
Andy:
ReplyDeleteI think the idea of a symposium is a great one. In terms of Rogers' model I can see how the sharing of new ideas will more readily bring early adopters and then the bulk of teachers on board.
I may suggest this for my school - we could do it in our regular faculty meetings.
Cheers,
Tony
Symposium is a very good idea to the organization as it encourages all teaching staff to participate in sharing new ideas and let them understand their knowledge recipient roles apart from being a knowledge transferer for students. Although it takes time for teaching staff to be used to this sharing platform, the intention of the organization will be appreciated by teaching staff from time to time when teaching staff find it beneficial to their development in the organization.
ReplyDeleteI agree that setting aside a specific time for knowledge creation can be a good thing. Although it does not happen in my Division (Public Services), my understanding is that in the Technical and Collection Services Division time is set aside at divisional meetings for a nominated colleague to present an idea for a new innovation or service.
ReplyDeleteAlthough it may put stress on the person whose turn it is, it does encourage people to come up with new ways of doing things. But we might ask - can we really force people to be creative?